Washington Redskins: Addressing the 2012 NFL Offseason! Trading up in the 2012 Draft!

Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com The Redskins did not have a good 2011 season. I believe this team has a lot of potential if they allocate their 40+million dollars of salary to the right places. I break down their 2012 off-season and give you my pick on who they should draft in April.

Share This!! :)
  • more Washington Redskins: Addressing the 2012 NFL Offseason! Trading up in the 2012 Draft!
About Winn Jones

Winn Jones is an expert in computer science, artificial intelligence
and sports research. He got his PHD from University of Texas at Austin in 1985
and has served as a consultant to industry since then. In 2010 he created
the foundation for ff-winners.com by programming Beardog the
intelligent supercomputer to predict NFL games and rank players and teams/

Comments

  1. tropicphantom676 says:

    For the browns its either RG3 or TR but if they take TR than the redskins will be damn lucky lol.. Maby to be honest they might try to trade their 1st round and 2nd or 3rd round to the colts for their 1st round and get luck but that is probably a 2% chance of happening..

  2. dorian1260 says:

    I believe they should keep London, because he can teach the next generation of inside linebackers. If we let him walk we will be walking blindly with our defense. Inside LB should b the QB of the defense, to let him go would be our dumbest move since…. well what am I talking about this is the redskins. Daniel Snyder is our owner.

  3. 101dumars says:

    @WakeUpItsFootball london fletcher has more miles left in him than Landry does. Landry cant stay on the field if his life depended on it

  4. SirCruz92 says:

    This guy is clearly not a Redskins fan. London Fletcher is our Ray Lewis and they both have the same passion to give 100% on every play and he said he is not planning on retiring so why not sign him back? He’s always been productive and when is the last time he missed to start a game? yeah Fletcher isn’t going anywhere he’ll be ending his career in DC

  5. dominionn09 says:

    People have been telling London Fletcher that he is too undersized his whole career.  Too old for the past couple seasons. Lol all he has done is produced and taken pro bowl trips.. all well after 30yo. He’s a beast and will be back

  6. HKISfreak1 says:

    @WakeUpItsFootball he lead the league in tackles last year at 26, hes one of the most durable players on the team, without him, we would suck ass, his leadership drives us, the guy has at least 3 years, mike shanahan made a PRIORITY to resign him..

  7. KRIIMZONx says:

    the redskins have a lot of potential to be good

  8. wakenbakejake420 says:

    @WakeUpItsFootball well i haven’t seen his play drop any over the last couple years so i say atleast 2

  9. WakeUpItsFootball says:

    @wakenbakejake420 Yeah but, London Fletcher is 36 years old. How many years do you think he has left in him?

  10. wakenbakejake420 says:

    @WakeUpItsFootball landrys plays 3 games a season….london is and has been the heart and soul of our defense since he’s been here,rocky macintosh is a bum and definitely won’t be back..

  11. WakeUpItsFootball says:

    @cgill69 Second only to Fred Davis? Really? You don’t think signing a talented, and younger player like LaRon Landry wouldn’t be higher up on the priority list?

  12. cgill69 says:

    London Fletcher too old? This guy is second only to Fred Davis in priority. He has some gas left in the tank. Too old, lol.

  13. killerelite33 says:

    trade up and get rg3 dont get peyton even if healthy he old we need a franchise qb and please resign fletcher and landry then sign free agent marques colston

  14. dane543 says:

    I have a strong feeling they are gonna get Peyton Manning

  15. nepalrock says:

    Although getting RGIII would be a great choice. Moving up to 2nd or 3rd position would mean that we won’t have top picks for at least 2 years which is a setback in my opinion. I say if Griffin falls then take him otherwise trade down and accumulate more picks like last year and build a younger squad.Tannehill certainly would be attainable as late 1st round pick if they trade down. He is on the move up in everybody’s draft.

  16. nepalrock says:

    Although getting RGIII would be a great choice. Moving up to 2nd or 3rd position would mean that we won’t have top picks for at least 2 years which is a setback in my opinion. I say if Griffin falls then take him otherwise trade down and accumulate more picks like last year and build a younger squad.Tannehill certainly would be attainable as late 1st round pick if they trade down. He is on the move up in everybody’s draft.

  17. mishhhstaMark says:

    i say they trade with rams to get 2nd pick so they can garentee that they get RG3

  18. astrostar49 says:

    If the Redskins have an opportunity to grab Robert Griffin III, they better take him. I think Mike Shanahan would be a good coach for him in that offense with all the bootlegs and rollouts. Cleveland is probably going to get Griffin first though, unless a trade happens like you said.

  19. luxio43 says:

    my mom is a redskin fan and she hasn’t had much to cheer about for a looong time lol…..but I seriously think that if they don’t take this opportunity to grab RG3, they won’t have another one for a while. I don’t think matt flynn would work well with the type of offense the redskins run

Speak Your Mind